April 23, 2026

The Times takes a deep dive into leaked SCOTUS memos related to the origins and implementation of the infamous "shadow docket" rulings.

TLDR; is how John Roberts argued they should stop Obama's attempt to regulate coal-fired power plants.

In public, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. has cultivated a reputation for care and caution. The papers reveal a different side of him. At a critical moment for the country and the court, the papers show, he acted as a bulldozer in pushing to stop Mr. Obama’s plan to address the global climate crisis.

When colleagues warned the chief justice that he was proposing an unprecedented move, he was dismissive. “I recognize that the posture of this stay request is not typical,” he wrote. But he argued that the Obama plan, which aimed to regulate coal-fired plants, was “the most expensive regulation ever imposed on the power sector,” and too big, costly and consequential for the court not to act immediately.

Imagine that. A Supreme Court justice said it out loud: Protecting the power industry from the financial consequences of their climate-destroying policies was more important than, you know, the climate.

On Feb. 5, the internal correspondence obtained by The Times shows, the chief justice circulated a blast of a memo, insisting that the court halt the president’s plan.

His arguments were forceful, quick, and filled with confident predictions. The court was going to give the case a full hearing eventually, he forecast. At that point, the justices would vote to overturn the Obama plan, he said, because it went beyond the boundaries of the Clean Air Act.

For now, the chief justice contended that the court had to act immediately because the energy industry “must make changes to business plans today.”

“Absent a stay, the Clean Power Plan will cause (and is causing) substantial and irreversible reordering of the domestic power sector before this court has an opportunity to review its legality,” he wrote.

And so on. You don't have to read this entire piece to know what John Roberts has never been sympathetic to the powerless (I'll just insert my favorite John Roberts wisdom here: "Never trust a grown man who wears red plaid pants") but he used to at least make a gesture in their direction, I suppose to give the impression that he was careful and rational.

He's not.

Here's a🧵about the Shadow Docket inspired by the NY Times reporting revealing 2016 internal SCOTUS memos regarding the Obama admin's Clean Power Plan. Let's start with the story. It explains what went on behind the scenes in 5-4 decision to block the plan before the lower courts ruled. /1

Michael C. Dorf (@dorfonlaw.bsky.social) 2026-04-18T12:25:15.939Z

The NYT story is a useful corrective to a contention that conservatives have frequently made: that the shadow docket was a response to the trend of district courts granting universal/nationwide injunctions. Justice Gorsuch (joined by Justices Thomas & Alito) made that claim expressly in 2024. /2👇

Michael C. Dorf (@dorfonlaw.bsky.social) 2026-04-18T12:25:15.940Z

"In the first major case in which the Court granted emergency relief as a means of shaping nationwide policy, it turns out that the justice who led the charge was the one who was doing quite a bit more than calling balls and strikes."

Me on Saturday's @nytimes.com scoop in today's "One First":

Steve Vladeck (@stevevladeck.bsky.social) 2026-04-20T11:04:58.187Z

OOP

New York Times got receipts on John Roberts being like, 'I know this isn't how anything works, but a Democratic president is about to implement a policy!!'

www.nytimes.com/2026/04/18/u...

Barred and Boujee aka Madiba Dennie (@audrelawdamercy.blacksky.app) 2026-04-18T14:41:03.937Z

Can you help us out?

For over 20 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but social media is limiting our ability to attract new readers. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
Mastodon