While Cliff's off somewhere working his way through a continent’s worth of carbohydrates, David Shuster and Ellie Leonard held down the fort — and brought reinforcements. They were joined by journalist Kait Justice (of Substack Downwind of Truth), whose latest pulls on a thread almost no one in corporate media will touch.
She discussed a set of overlooked vulnerabilities—to both foreign and domestic bad actors—in America’s voting infrastructure that go around certified machines themselves. A strange mathematical technique Jeffrey Epstein, in emails in the released files, was hunting for code-breakers who knew how to use. It lines up with an offhand boast from Elon Musk about unleashing “an anomaly in the matrix” that Kait noticed lined up with a very specific piece of NSA-grade math. Epstein, Musk, and a statement mirroring NSA math that could be about vote hacking. Got it?
Is she saying the 2024 election was stolen? No. Is she saying it’s technically possible — and that no one in a position to investigate is bothering to? Yes, and that's what's so insane. There are no conspiracy theories here, just a search for verifiable evidence, which would take nothing more than verifying votes in a swing state. Or what every other democracy on Earth does to be safe. Why won't Democrats demand this?
